Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

The TPACK model as an analysis perspective in the integration of ICTs in education: a state of the art.

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)*
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Jerez, Sergio Alejandrospa
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T14:48:46Zspa
dc.date.available2021-10-08T14:48:46Zspa
dc.date.created2020spa
dc.date.issued2020-12spa
dc.identifier.citationRodríguez Jerez, S. A. (2020). The TPACK model as an analysis perspective in the integration of ICTs in education: a state of the art. En Molina Bernal, I. A., Morales Piñero, J.C & Rodríguez Jerez, S.A. (compiladores), Importance of ICT in the teaching-learning process: middle and higher education studies (pp. 13-32). Universidad Sergio Arboleda. 10.22518/book/9789585158092eng
dc.identifier.isbn978-958-5158-09-2spa
dc.description.abstractThe process of integrating ICTs in education is a phenomenon that has been relatively studied in recent decades. Nevertheless, throughout the last five years, due to the dynamics of what is now called the di gital age, the concern to improve education using new technologies has increased. This chapter aims to analyze the most relevant publica tions on this matter to describe the status quo. The TPACK model is used as an analysis perspective due to its high relevance in integrating ICTs in education. Likewise, the descriptive methodology uses the interpretation levels proposed by Rodríguez Jerez (2019) to carry out a hermeneutic analysis. The results obtained are organized from the area, and the units of convergence are found. The conclusions provide a framework to reflect and understand the current process of integrating ICTs in teaching and learning.eng
dc.format.extent19eng
dc.format.mediumDigitalspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfeng
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Sergio Arboledaspa
dc.relation.ispartofImportance of ICT in the teaching-learning process: middle and higher education studies.eng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSerie Investigaciónspa
dc.relation.isversionof1spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.titleThe TPACK model as an analysis perspective in the integration of ICTs in education: a state of the art.spa
dc.subject.lembModelos de enseñanza – Innovaciones tecnológicas - Investigacionesspa
dc.subject.lembMétodos de enseñanzaspa
dc.subject.lembEstado del artespa
dc.subject.lembEvaluación de revistasspa
dc.subject.lembTecnología educativaspa
dc.subject.lembFormación profesional de maestrosspa
dc.subject.lembTeaching models - Technological innovations – Researcheng
dc.subject.lembTeaching Methodseng
dc.subject.lembState of the arteng
dc.subject.lembJournal evaluationeng
dc.subject.lembEducational technologyeng
dc.subject.lembTeachers - Training ofeng
dc.publisher.programEscuela de Filosofía y Humanidades., Escuela de Ciencias Exactas e Ingeniería., Escuela de Educaciónspa
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.22518/book/9789585158092/ch1spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.relation.referencesAkyuz, D. (2018). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through performance assessment. Computers and Education, 125, 212–225. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.012eng
dc.relation.referencesAlmerich, G., Orellana, N., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., & Díaz-García, I. (2016). Teachers’ information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers and Education, 100, 110–125. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.002eng
dc.relation.referencesBlackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2016). The influence of TPACK contextual factors on early childhood educators’ tablet computer use. Computers and Education, 98, 57–69. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.010eng
dc.relation.referencesBueno-Alastuey, M. C., Villarreal, I., & García-Esteban, S. (2018). Can telecollaboration contribute to the TPACK development of pre-service teachers? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(3), 367–380. doi: 10.1080/ 1475939X.2018.1471000eng
dc.relation.referencesCabero, J., Marín, V., & Castaño, C. (2015). Validation of the application of TPACK framework to train teacher in the use of ICT. @tic. Revista d’innovació Educativa, 0(14), 13–22. doi: 10.7203/attic.14.4001eng
dc.relation.referencesCheng, S. L., & Xie, K. (2018). The relations among teacher value beliefs, personal characteristics, and TPACK in intervention and non-intervention settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 98–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.014eng
dc.relation.referencesChigona, A. (2015). Pedagogical shift in the twenty-first century: preparing teachers to teach with new technologies. Africa Education Review, 12(3), 478–492. doi: 10.1080/18146627.2015.1110912eng
dc.relation.referencesChuang, H.-H., Weng, C.-Y., & Huang, F.-C. (2015). A structure equation model among factors of teachers’ technology integration practice and their TPCK. Computers & Education, 86, 182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.016eng
dc.relation.referencesCubeles, A., & Riu, D. (2018). The effective integration of ICTs in universities: the role of knowledge and academic experience of professors. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(3), 339–349. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2018.1457978eng
dc.relation.referencesFlores, A. (2018). Didactic conceptions and use of ICT in the university education of degree. Multi-case study and TPACK analysis framework. Praxis Educativa, 22(1), 64–72. doi: 10.19137/praxiseducativa-2018-220106eng
dc.relation.referencesGill, L., & Dalgarno, B. (2017). A qualitative analysis of pre-service primary school teachers’ TPACK development over the four years of their teacher preparation programme. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 439–456. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2017.1287124eng
dc.relation.referencesGutiérrez, I. (2014). Perfil del profesor universitario español en torno a las competencias en tecnologías de la información y la comunicación. Pixel-Bit Revista de Medios y Educación, 51–65. doi: 10.12795/pixelbit.2014.i44.04spa
dc.relation.referencesHaydn, T. (2014). How do you get pre-service teachers to become ‘good at ICT’ in their subject teaching? The views of expert practitioners. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(4), 455–469. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2014.892898eng
dc.relation.referencesHeidegger, M. (1997). La pregunta por la técnica. In Filosofía, Ciencia y Técnica.eng
dc.relation.referencesHsu, S. (2017). Developing and validating a scale for measuring changes in teachers’ ICT integration proficiency over time. Computers and Education, 111, 18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.001eng
dc.relation.referencesJamieson-Proctor, R., Finger, G., & Albion, P. R. (2010). Auditing the TPACK Capabilities of Final Year Teacher Education Students: Are they ready for the 21st century? In Digital Diversity: Australian Computers in Education Conference 2010.eng
dc.relation.referencesJang, S. J., & Tsai, M. F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers and Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003eng
dc.relation.referencesJimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers and Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022eng
dc.relation.referencesJoo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, N. H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers and Education, 95, 114–122. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.004eng
dc.relation.referencesJude, L., Kajura, M., & Birevu, M. (2014). Adoption of the SAMR Model to Asses ICT Pedagogical Adoption: A Case of Makerere University. International Journal of E-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 4(2). doi:10.7763/ijeeee.2014.v4.312eng
dc.relation.referencesKihoza, P., Zlotnikova, I., Bada, J., & Kalegele, K. (2016). Classroom ICT integration in Tanzania: Opportunities and challenges from the perspectives of TPACK and SAMR models. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 12(1), 107–128.eng
dc.relation.referencesKosnik, C., White, S., Beck, C., Marshall, B., Lin Goodwin, A., & Murray, J. (2016). Building bridges: Rethinking Literacy Teacher Education in a Digital Era. doi: 10.1163/9789463004916eng
dc.relation.referencesLachner, A., Backfisch, I., & Stürmer, K. (2019). A test-based approach of Modeling and Measuring Technological Pedagogical Knowledge. Computers & Education, 142, 103645. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103645eng
dc.relation.referencesLai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers and Education, 133, 27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010eng
dc.relation.referencesLefebvre Sonia, P. D. (2014). Intégration des technologies de l’information et de la communication: types de connaissances abordées dans le discours d’enseignants en exercice et d’étudiants en formation initiale. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne de l’éducation, 37(3), 1. Retreieved September 26, 2019 from http//pdfs.semanticscholar. org/1105/21303871ff44627a121d8e2715a6468d409b.pdffre
dc.relation.referencesLi, G., Sun, Z., & Jee, Y. (2019). The more technology the better? A comparison of teacher-student interaction in high and low technology use elementary EFL classrooms in China. System, 84, 24–40. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2019.05.003eng
dc.relation.referencesLópez-García, J.-C. (2015). SAMR, modelo para integrar las TIC en procesos educativos. Retreieved from: http//Eduteka.Icesi.Edu.Co/Articulos/Samr website: http://eduteka.icesi.edu.co/articulos/samrspa
dc.relation.referencesMaxwell, I. A. (2014). The fifth industrial revolution. Chemistry in Australia, p. 38.eng
dc.relation.referencesMcCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K., Lee, H., Harrison, T., & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers’ integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers and Education, 123, 26–40. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.008eng
dc.relation.referencesMei, B. (2019). Preparing preservice EFL teachers for CALL normalisation: A technology acceptance perspective. System, 83, 13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2019.02.011eng
dc.relation.referencesMei, X. Y., Aas, E., & Medgard, M. (2019). Teachers’ use of digital learning tool for teaching in higher education: Exploring teaching practice and sharing culture. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(3), 522–537. doi: 10.1108/JARHE-10-2018-0202eng
dc.relation.referencesMishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006a). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.xeng
dc.relation.referencesMoreira-Fontán, E., García-Señorán, M., Conde-Rodríguez, Á., & González, A. (2019). Teachers’ ICT-related self-efficacy, job resources, and positive emotions: Their structural relations with autonomous motivation and work engagement. Computers and Education, 134, 63–77. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.007eng
dc.relation.referencesNelson, M. J., Voithofer, R., & Cheng, S. L. (2019). Mediating factors that influence the technology integration practices of teacher educators. Computers and Education, 128, 330–344. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.023eng
dc.relation.referencesOrtega & Gasset, J. (1982). Meditación de la técnica y otros ensayos sobre ciencia y filosofía. In Obras de José Ortega & Gasset. Madrid, España: Revista de Occidente/ Alianza Editorial.spa
dc.relation.referencesPetko, D., Egger, N., Cantieni, A., & Wespi, B. (2015). Digital media adoption in schools: Bottom-up, top-down, complementary or optional? Computers and Education, 84, 49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.019eng
dc.relation.referencesPretto, G., & Curró, G. (2017). An Approach for Doctoral Students Conducting Context-Specific Review of Literature in IT, ICT, and Educational Technology. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23(1), 60–83. doi:10.1080/13614533.2016.1227861eng
dc.relation.referencesPunie, Y. (2007). Learning spaces: An ICT-enabled model of future learning in the Knowledge-based Society. European Journal of Education, 42(2), 185–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00302.xeng
dc.relation.referencesReyes, V. C., Reading, C., Doyle, H., & Gregory, S. (2017). Integrating ICT into teacher education programs from a TPACK perspective: Exploring perceptions of university lecturers. Computers and Education, 115, 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.009eng
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez Jerez, S. A. (2019). Aproximaciones de una metodología semiótica para el análisis de la educación en Colombia: un aporte al desarrollo de la edusemiótica. PRACS: Revista Eletrônica de Humanidades Do Curso de Ciências Sociais Da UNIFAP, 11(2), 117. doi: 10.18468/pracs.2018v11n2.p117-126por
dc.relation.referencesSampson, D., & Fytros, D. (2008). Competence Models in Technology-Enhanced Competence-Based Learning. In Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training (pp. 155–177). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74155-8_9eng
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Prieto, J. C., Hernández-García, Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Chaparro Peláez, J., & Olmos-Migueláñez, S. (2019). Break the walls! Second-Order barriers and the acceptance of mLearning by first-year pre-service teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 158–167. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.019eng
dc.relation.referencesScherer, R., Rohatgi, A., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Students’ profiles of ICT use: Identification, determinants, and relations to achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 486–499. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.034eng
dc.relation.referencesScherer, R., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2017). On the quest for validity: Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance of the technology-dimensions in the Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model. Computers and Education, 112, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.012eng
dc.relation.referencesScherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2018). The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modeling approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 67–80. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003eng
dc.relation.referencesSointu, E., Valtonen, T., Hirsto, L., Kankaanpaa, Jenni Saarelainen, M., Makitalo, K., Smits, A., & Manninen, J. (2019). Teachers as users of ICT from the student perspective in higher education flipped classroom classes. Seminar.Net: Media, Technology & Lifelong Learning, 15(1), 1–15.eng
dc.relation.referencesSpante, M., Karlsen, A. V., Nortvig, A.-M., & Christiansen, R. B. (2014). Cross-Border Collaboration in History among Nordic Students: A Case Study about Creating Innovative ICT Didactic Models. In IAFOR Journal of Education (Vol. 2). doi: 10.22492/ije.2.2.02eng
dc.relation.referencesStockless, A., Villeneuve, S., & Gingras, B. (2018). Maitrise d’outils technologiques : son influence sur la compétence TIC des enseignants et les usages pédagogiques | Mastery of Digital Tools: The Influence on Information and Communication Technologies Competency and Pedagogical Use. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 44(2). doi: 10.21432/cjlt27581fre
dc.relation.referencesTaimalu, M., & Luik, P. (2019). The impact of beliefs and knowledge on the integration of technology among teacher educators: A path analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.012eng
dc.relation.referencesTømte, C., Enochsson, A. B., Buskqvist, U., & Kårstein, A. (2015). Educating online student teachers to master professional digital competence: The TPACK-framework goes online. Computers and Education, 84, 26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.005eng
dc.relation.referencesTondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers and Education, 122, 32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002eng
dc.relation.referencesTondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2017). A comprehensive investigation of TPACK within pre-service teachers’ ICT profiles: Mind the gap! Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 46–60. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3504eng
dc.relation.referencesTseng, J.-J., Cheng, Y.-S., & Yeh, H.-N. (2019). How pre-service English teachers enact TPACK in the context of web-conferencing teaching: A design thinking approach. Computers & Education, 128, 171–182. doi: 10.1016/j. compedu.2018.09.022eng
dc.relation.referencesTsybulsky, D., & Levin, I. (2016). SAMR Framework for Study Technology Integration in Science Education. In New Perspectives in Science Education. Retreived September 26, 2019, from http: https://m.tau.ac.il/~ilia1/ perspectives-florence.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesUerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018, February 1). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 70, pp. 12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005eng
dc.relation.referencesValtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 15–31. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3518eng
dc.relation.referencesVinck, D. (2018). Humanidades Digitales. Barcelona, España: Gedisa.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, J., Tigelaar, D. E. H., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Connecting rural schools to quality education: Rural teachers’ use of digital educational resources. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.009eng
dc.relation.referencesWu, B., Hu, Y., Gu, X., & Lim, C. P. (2015). Professional Development of New Higher Education Teachers with Information and Communication Technology in Shanghai. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(4), 531–562. doi: 10.1177/0735633115621922eng
dc.relation.referencesXiong, X. B., & Lim, C. P. (2015). Curriculum Leadership and the Development of ICT in Education Competencies of Pre-service Teachers in South China. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 515–524. doi: 10.1007/s40299-015-0238-1eng
dc.relation.referencesYildiz, T. (2016). The exploration of the relationships between the global competitiveness, the ICT and education. Business, Management and Education, 14(2), 249–274. doi: 10.3846/bme.2016.320eng
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2*
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Sergio Arboledaspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Sergio Arboledaspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: https://repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co/*
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248*
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CAP_LIB*
dc.type.localCapítulo de Librospa
dc.relation.citationstartpage13spa
dc.relation.citationendpage32spa
dc.subject.proposalICTseng
dc.subject.proposaleducationeng
dc.subject.proposalTPACK modeleng
dc.identifier.urlhttp://hdl.handle.net/11232/1761eng


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
The TPACK model as an analysis ...
Tamaño:
5.985Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Capítulo de libro
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)