Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Democracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género.

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)*
dc.contributor.authorJaramillo Ruiz, Felipespa
dc.date2013spa
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-22T21:13:54Zspa
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-11T14:36:20Zspa
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-16T17:07:59Zspa
dc.date.available2015-07-22T21:13:54Zspa
dc.date.available2016-05-11T14:36:20Zspa
dc.date.available2017-05-16T17:07:59Zspa
dc.date.issued2013-07-01spa
dc.identifier.citationJaramillo Ruiz, F. (2013). Democracy, parity and change. An institutional space for gender relations. Civilizar: Ciencias Sociales Y Humanas, 13(25), 67-84spa
dc.identifier.issn1657-8953spa
dc.description.abstractIn this article; I examine how gender parity is a viable mechanism to protect the capacity of transformation that characterizes democracy. Fundamentally; I contend that a democratic system needs to provide arenas of deliberation in order to contest gender relations and eradicate practices of domination. Moreover; I argue that the exclusion and censorship of groups that question the predominant gender practices contradicts the spirit of democracy. Therefore; if women do not find institutional paths to express their ideas and to materialize their desires and beliefs; democratic institutions must be designed so as to enable these processes of inclusion.eng
dc.description.abstractEl artículo examina cómo la paridad de género es un mecanismo viable para proteger la capacidad de transformación que caracteriza a la democracia. Fundamentalmente; se sostiene que un sistema democrático debe ofrecer espacios de deliberación con el fin de debatir las relaciones de género y erradicar las prácticas de dominación. Así; se argumenta que la exclusión y censura de los grupos que cuestionan las prácticas predominantes de género contradice el espíritu de la democracia. Por lo tanto; si las mujeres no encuentran caminos institucionales para expresar sus ideas y materializar sus deseos y creencias; se deben diseñar instituciones democráticas que permitan su mayor inclusiónspa
dc.format.extent18spa
dc.format.mediumDigitalspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfeng
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Sergio Arboledaspa
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas,vol. 13, núm 25 (2013)spa
dc.source.urihttp://revistas.usergioarboleda.edu.co/index.php/ccsh/article/view/129/120eng
dc.titleDemocracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género.spa
dc.subject.lembParticipación de la mujerspa
dc.subject.lembMujeres en el desarrollo de la comunidadspa
dc.subject.lembMujeres - Actividad políticaspa
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85eng
dc.format.tipodocumentosspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22518/16578953.129eng
dc.relation.referencesAdkins, L. (2008). From Retroactivation to Futurity: The End of the Sexual Contract?. NORA- Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 16(3), 182-201. doi: 10.1080/08038740802300954eng
dc.relation.referencesBeer, C. (2009). Democracy and Gender Equality. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44, 212-227. doi: 10.1007/s12116-009-9043-2eng
dc.relation.referencesBeitz, C. (1990). Political Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesBohman, J. (1996). Public Deliberation. Cambridge: MIT Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesBoucher, J. (2003). Male Power and Contract Theory: Hobbes and Locke in Carole Pateman’s ‘The Sexual Contract’. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 23-38.eng
dc.relation.referencesBryce, J. (1923). Modern Democracies. London: Macmillan & Co.eng
dc.relation.referencesCohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In: A. Hamlin, & P. Pettit (Eds.), The Good Polity, (pp. 143-151).London: Blackwell.eng
dc.relation.referencesEagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation.New Jersey: Erlbaum.eng
dc.relation.referencesEagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders. Psychological Review,109(3), 573-598.eng
dc.relation.referencesFoucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punishment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.eng
dc.relation.referencesFoucault, M. (1980). The History of Sexuality, vol. 1: An Introduction. London: Penguin.eng
dc.relation.referencesFoucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry. 8(4), 777-795.eng
dc.relation.referencesFoucault, M. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. In: P. Rabinow (Ed.), TheEssential Works of Michel Foucault (pp. 281-302). New York: The New Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesFuchs, G., & Hoecker, B. (2004). Without Women merely a Half-Democracy. European Politics. Recuperado de http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/02611.pdf.eng
dc.relation.referencesGoffman, E. (1977). The Arrangement Between the Sexes. Theory and Society, 4(3), 301-331.eng
dc.relation.referencesGoodin, R. E. (1966). Inclusion and Exclusion. European Journal of Sociology, 37(2), 343-371. doi: 10.1017/S000397 5600007219eng
dc.relation.referencesHaugaard, M. (2010). Democracy, political power, and authority. Social Research: An International Quarterly,77(4), 1049-1074.eng
dc.relation.referencesHaugaard, M. (2012). Power Over and Democracy: the four dimensions of power as a condition of possibility for democracy. Working Paper.eng
dc.relation.referencesHonneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesJónasdóttir, A. G. (1988). Does Sex Matter to Democracy?. Scandinavian Political Studies, 4, 299-322.eng
dc.relation.referencesKeating, C. (2007). Framing the Postcolonial Sexual Contract: Democracy, Fraternalism, and State Authority in India. Hypatia,22(4), 130-145.eng
dc.relation.referencesLemke, T. (2010). Foucault’s Hypothesis: From the Critique of the Juridico-Discursive Concept of Power to an Analytics of Government. Parrhesia,9, 31-43.eng
dc.relation.referencesMansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.eng
dc.relation.referencesMarch, J. G., & Olsen J. P. (2005). Elaborating the “New Institutionalism”. Working Paper. Recuperado de http://www.cpp.amu.edu.pl/pdf/olsen2.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesNoval, A. J. (2004). Hegemony after deconstruction: the consequences of undecidability. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(2), 139-157. doi: 10.1080/13569 310410001691187eng
dc.relation.referencesNussbaum, M. C. (1996). Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism. In: M. Nussbaum (Ed.). For love of Country? (pp. 3-20). Boston: Beacon Press Books.eng
dc.relation.referencesNussbaum, M. C. (1997). Capabilities and Human Rights. Fordham Law Review, 66(2), 273-300.eng
dc.relation.referencesOrwell, G. (1948). 1984. Recuperado de http://www.planetebook.com/ebooks/1984.pdf.eng
dc.relation.referencesOsler, A., & Starkey, H. (2005). Changing Citizenship: Democracy and inclusion in education. New York: Open University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesPadgug, R. A. (1979). Sexual Matters: On Conceptualizing Sexuality In History. Radical History Review, 1979(20), 3-23. doi: 10.1215/01636545-1979-20-3eng
dc.relation.referencesParijs, P. M. (1996). Justice and Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 4(2), 101-117.eng
dc.relation.referencesPateman, C. (1983). Feminism and Democracy. In: G. Duncan (Ed.), Democratic Theory and Practice (pp. 204-2017). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesPateman, C. (1985). Women and Democratic Citizenship. In: The Jefferson Memorial Lectures at the University of California. Berkley. Unpublished manuscript.eng
dc.relation.referencesPateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesPatomäki, H. (2008). The Political Economy of Global Security: War, future crises and changes in global governance. New York: Routledge.eng
dc.relation.referencesProkhovnik, R. (1998). Public and Private Citizenship: From Gender Invisibility to Feminist Inclusiveness. Feminist Review, 60, 84-104.eng
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Rubio-Marin, R.M. (2008). The gender of representation: On democracy, equality, and parity. International Journal of Constitutional Law,6(2) 287-316. doi: 10.1093/icon/mon007eng
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Rubio-Marin, R. (2009). Constitutional Justification of Parity Democracy. Alabama Law Review, 60(5), 1171-1195.eng
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Rubio-Marin, R. (2010). La democracia como democracia paritaria. En: D. Heim, & Encarna Bodelón González (Ed.), Derecho Género Igualdad: Cambios en las Estructuras Jurídicas Androcéntricas (pp. 299-315). Barcelona: Grupo Antígona.eng
dc.relation.referencesRubio-Marín, R. (2012). A New European Parity-Democracy Sex Equality Model and why it won’t Fly in the United States. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 60(1), 99-126eng
dc.relation.referencesSchemiel,Y. (2000). Democracy Before Democracy?. International Political Science Review, 21(2), 99-120. doi: 10.1177/ 0192512100212001eng
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, C. (1994). The Politics of Recognition. A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism (pp. 25-74). Princeton: Princeton University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTeivainen, T. (2011). Global democratization without hierarchy or leadership? The World Social Forum in the capitalist world. In S. Gill (Ed.), Global Crises and the Crisis of Global Leadership, (pp. 181-198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesTilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution.Osborne: McGraw Hill.eng
dc.relation.referencesTorfing, J. (2005). Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges. In J Torfing, & D. Howarth (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: identity, policy and governance (pp.1-32). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.eng
dc.relation.referencesWalby, S. (1994). Is Citizenship Gendered?. Sociology,28(2), 379-395. doi: 10.1177/0038038594028002002eng
dc.relation.referencesWarren, M. (1996). What should we Expect from More Democracy? Radically Democratic Responses to Politics. Political Theory, 24(2), 241-270.eng
dc.relation.referencesWaylen, G. (1994). Women and Democratization. World Politics, 45(3). 327-354.eng
dc.relation.referencesYoung, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesYoung, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford Oxford University Press.eng
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2*
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Sergio Arboledaspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Sergio Arboledaspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co/*
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1eng
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTeng
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalCivilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanidadesspa
dc.relation.citationvolumen13spa
dc.relation.citationissue25spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage67spa
dc.relation.citationendpage84spa
dc.subject.proposalgender relationseng
dc.subject.proposaldemocracyeng
dc.subject.proposalinclusion and powereng
dc.subject.proposalrelaciones de génerospa
dc.subject.proposalparidadspa
dc.subject.proposaldemocraciaspa
dc.subject.proposalinclusión y poderspa
dc.title.translatedDemocracy, parity and change. An institutional space for gender relations.eng
dc.identifier.urlhttp://hdl.handle.net/11232/291eng


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Democracy parity and change. An ...
Tamaño:
233bytes
Formato:
HTML
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem