Show simple item record

Análisis de la política exterior

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)*
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, Fabiospa
dc.contributor.authorAcosta, Claraspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-06T02:58:13Zspa
dc.date.available2020-10-06T02:58:13Zspa
dc.date.created2020spa
dc.date.issued2020-08spa
dc.identifier.isbn978-958-5511-97-2spa
dc.identifier.otherhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0042-9830spa
dc.identifier.otherhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-6376spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11232/1459eng
dc.description.abstractEl Análisis de Política Exterior (en adelante APE) representa un área de estudio importante y especializada en la disciplina de las Relaciones Internacionales (Hudson, 2002, 2012). Busca identificar a través de diferentes niveles de análisis, teorías y estudios de caso, los factores y procesos que inciden en la toma de decisiones en materia de política exterior de los Estados. Los trabajos pioneros se enfocaron en: procesos de toma de decisión (Snyder, Bruck, & Sapin, 1954), el contexto de la política exterior (Sprout & Sprout, 1956) y, en la Política Exterior Comparada (Rosenau, 1966). Desde entonces, las principales investigaciones del APE se han centrado en: procesos cognitivos, la personalidad de los líderes, dinámicas de grupos pequeños, procesos organizacionales y burocráticos, la cultura, la agenda doméstica, los atributos de los Estados y los efectos del sistema internacional (Halperin & Clapp, 2006; Hudson, 2007, 2012; Neack, 2019). El APE permite hallar los factores socioculturales y burocráticos que han incidido en las grandes decisiones en materia de política exterior a través de la historia; desde la guerra hasta la cooperación. Asimismo, valora el papel de los seres humanos como tomadores de decisiones y su capacidad de agencia, lo cual facilita abrir la “caja negra” del Estado que contiene la información relativa a procesos y decisiones encaminados a la siempre compleja acción exterior.spa
dc.format.extent30spa
dc.format.mediumDigitalspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Sergio Arboledaspa
dc.relation.ispartofManual de ciencia política y relaciones internacionalesspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.titleAnálisis de la política exteriorspa
dc.subject.lembCiencias políticas - Manualesspa
dc.subject.lembRelaciones Internacionales - Manualesspa
dc.subject.lembPolítica exteriorspa
dc.subject.lembRelaciones internacionalesspa
dc.subject.lembLiberalismospa
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Políticas y Relaciones Internacionalesspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22518/book/9789585511972/ch06spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez, F. y Acosta, C. (2020). Análisis de la política exterior. En: Sánchez, F. y Liendo, N. (ed.), Manual de ciencia política y relaciones internacionales (pp. 153 - 183). Bogotá: Universidad Sergio Arboledaspa
dc.relation.referencesAllison, G. (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (1a ed.). Boston: Little Brown and Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesAxelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics, 38(1), 226–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357spa
dc.relation.referencesBarbé, E. (2007). Relaciones Internacionales. Madrid: Tecnos.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarr, K., & Mintz, A. (2018). Public Policy Perspective on Group Decision-Making Dynamics in Foreign Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 46, S69–S90. https://doi. org/10.1111/psj.12249spa
dc.relation.referencesBrecher, M., Steinberg, B., & Stein, J. (1969). A framework for research on foreign policy behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 13(1), 75–94. https://doi. org/10.1177/002200276901300105spa
dc.relation.referencesBreuning, M. (2007). Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction (1a ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesBruce, R. (1993). Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBull, H. (1995). The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics (2a ed.). Londres: Macmillan Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de los Estados Unidos. (1997). Bill Clinton and Officials on Air Force One [Imagen 1]. Recuperado a partir de https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5724347spa
dc.relation.referencesDoyle, M. (1983a). Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part 2. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(4), 323–353.spa
dc.relation.referencesDoyle, M. (1983b). Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(3), 205–235.spa
dc.relation.referencesDoyle, M. (1986). Liberalism and World Politics. The American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1151–1169.spa
dc.relation.referencesDoyle, M. (2012). Liberalism and foreign policy. En S. Smith, A. Hadfield, & T. Dunne (Eds.), Foreign Policy. Theories, actors, cases (2nd ed., pp. 54–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesDW. (2020). ¿Qué busca la diplomacia china de las mascarillas en Latinoamérica? Recuperado a partir de https://www.dw.com/es/qué-busca-la-diplomaciachina-de-las-mascarillas-en-latinoamérica/a-53227101spa
dc.relation.referencesHalperin, M., & Clapp, P. (2006). Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHermann, M. (1978). Effects of Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders on Foreign Policy. En M. A. East & S. A. Salmore (Eds.), Why Nations Act: Theoretical Perspectives for Comparative Foreign Policy Studies (pp. 49–68). Beverly Hills: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesHermann, M. (1980). Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders. International Studies Quarterly, 24(1), 7. https:// doi.org/10.2307/2600126spa
dc.relation.referencesHermann, M. (2003). Assessing Leadership Style: Trait Analysis. En J. Post (Ed.), The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders (pp. 178–214). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolsti, K. (1970). National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 233. https://doi.org/10.2307/3013584spa
dc.relation.referencesJanis, I. (1973). Groupthink and Group Dynamics: a Social Psychological Analysis of Defective Policy Decisions. Policy Studies Journal, 2(1), 19–25. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1973.tb00117.xspa
dc.relation.referencesJanis, I. (1982). Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Companyspa
dc.relation.referencesJepperson, R. L., Wendt, A., & Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security. En P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (pp. 33–75). New York: Columbia University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesKatzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). (1996). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesKennan, G. (1946). Long Telegram. Recuperado a partir de https://digitalarchive. wilsoncenter.org/document/116178spa
dc.relation.referencesLayne, C. (1994). Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace. International Security, 19(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539195spa
dc.relation.referencesMearsheimer, J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078spa
dc.relation.referencesMearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power politics. New York: Norton.spa
dc.relation.referencesMintz, A., & DeRouen, K. (2010). Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMintz, A., & Wayne, C. (2016). The Polythink Syndrome: U.S. Foreign Policy Decisions on 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, and ISIS. Stanford: Stanford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447spa
dc.relation.referencesRittberger, V. (2004). Approaches to the Study of Foreign Policy Derived from International Relations Theories. Tübingen: University of Tübingen, Center for International Relations/Peace and Conflict Studies, Institute for Political Science.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, J., & Snyder, R. (1965). Decision-Making in International Politics. En H. C. Kelman (Ed.), International Behavior: A Social-Psychological Analysis (pp. 433–463). New York: Rinehart and Winstonspa
dc.relation.referencesRosato, S. (2003). The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000893spa
dc.relation.referencesRose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814spa
dc.relation.referencesRosenau, J. (1966). Pre-Theories and Theories of Foreign Policy. En B. Farrel (Ed.), Approaches to Comparative and International Politics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTaliaferro, J., Lobell, S., & Ripsman, N. (2009). Introduction: Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. En S. Lobell, N. Ripsman, & J. Taliaferro (Eds.), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTruman Library Institute. (2016). Long Telegram [Imagen 3]. Recuperado a partir de https://www.trumanlibraryinstitute.org/this-day-in-history-2/spa
dc.relation.referencesWalt, S. (1985). Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power. International Security, 9(4), 3. https://doi.org/10.2307/2538540spa
dc.relation.referencesWalt, S. (1987). The Origins of Alliances. New York: Cornell University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWalt, S. (1998). International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy, (110), 29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275spa
dc.relation.referencesWalt, S. (2005). The Relationship Between Theory and Policy in International Relations. Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.polisci.7.012003.104904spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2*
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Sergio Arboledaspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Sergio Arboledaspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co/*
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248*
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/CAP_LIB*
dc.type.localCapítulo de Librospa
dc.relation.citationstartpage153spa
dc.relation.citationendpage183spa
dc.subject.proposalForeign policyeng
dc.subject.proposalInternational relationseng
dc.subject.proposalLiberalismeng


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Análisis de política exterior.pdf
Size:
1.110Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
capítulo 6
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)